Early Awake Prone Position Combined with High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in Severe COVID-19: A Case Series.

Background: Awake prone positioning has been used for non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure, but the results are contradictory. We aimed to highlight the role of awake prone positioning combined with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in severe COVID-19 patients infected with the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. Methods: From June 12 to December 7, 2021, we successfully performed prone position(PP) combined with high-flow nasal oxygen(HFNO) therapy on two patients infected with the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. HFNO was prescribed to reach SpO2 ≥ 92%. PP was proposed to patients with PaO2/FiO2(P/F) < 150 mmHg. Arterial blood gas (ABG) and hemodynamic were monitored before and after PP sessions. The target time of PP was more than 12 h per day and could be appropriately shortened according to the patient's tolerance. Relevant clinical data, HFNO parameters, PICCO parameters, P/F ratio and PP duration were obtained from medical records. Results: A total of 23 PP sessions and 6 PP sessions combined with HFNO were performed in case 1 and case 2, respectively. Compared with values before PP, GEDI, ELWI and Qs/Qt decreased significantly (GEDI: 869.50 ± 60.50 ml/m2 vs. 756.86 ± 88.25 ml/m2; ELWI: 13.64 ± 2.82 ml/kg vs. 12.43 ± 2.50 ml/kg; Qs/Qt: 15.32 ± 6.52% vs. 12.24 ± 5.39%; all p < 0.05), Meanwhile, the oxygenation improved significantly (P/F: 184.50 ± 51.92 mmHg vs. 234.21 ± 88.84 mmHg, p < 0.05), The chest CT revealed the lung infiltrates improved significantly after PP. Both cases were discharged to a dedicated COVID-19 ward without requiring intubation. Conclusions: Combining PP with HFNO could be a useful treatment strategy for avoiding intubation in severe COVID-19 patients infected with the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 to improve pulmonary vascular involvement, improve oxygenation and avoid intubation, but further studies are needed to validate our approach.

Computational design and experimental analysis of a novel visor for COVID-19 patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen therapy

The Covid-19 global pandemic has reshaped the requirements of healthcare sectors worldwide. Following the exposure risks associated with Covid-19, this paper aims to design, optimise, and validate a wearable medical device that reduces the risk of transmission of contagious droplets from infected patients in a hospital setting. This study specifically focuses on those receiving high-flow nasal oxygen therapy. The design process consisted of optimising the geometry of the visor to ensure that the maximum possible percentage of harmful droplets exhaled by the patient can be successfully captured by a vacuum tube attached to the visor. This has been completed by deriving a number of concept designs and assessing their effectiveness, based on numerical analysis, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and experimental testing. The CFD results are validated using various experimental methods such as Schlieren imaging, particle measurement testing and laser sheet visualisation. Droplet capturing efficiency of the visor was measured through CFD and validated through experimental particle measurement testing. The results presented a 5% deviation between CFD and experimental results. Also, the modifications based on the validated CFD results improved the visor effectiveness by 47% and 38% for breathing and coughing events, respectively © 2022 The Author(s)

Computational design and experimental analysis of a novel visor for COVID-19 patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen therapy

The Covid-19 global pandemic has reshaped the requirements of healthcare sectors worldwide. Following the exposure risks associated with Covid-19, this paper aims to design, optimise, and validate a wearable medical device that reduces the risk of transmission of contagious droplets from infected patients in a hospital setting. This study specifically focuses on those receiving high-flow nasal oxygen therapy. The design process consisted of optimising the geometry of the visor to ensure that the maximum possible percentage of harmful droplets exhaled by the patient can be successfully captured by a vacuum tube attached to the visor. This has been completed by deriving a number of concept designs and assessing their effectiveness, based on numerical analysis, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and experimental testing. The CFD results are validated using various experimental methods such as Schlieren imaging, particle measurement testing and laser sheet visualisation. Droplet capturing efficiency of the visor was measured through CFD and validated through experimental particle measurement testing. The results presented a 5% deviation between CFD and experimental results. Also, the modifications based on the validated CFD results improved the visor effectiveness by 47% and 38% for breathing and coughing events, respectively [ FROM AUTHOR]

Computational design and experimental analysis of a visor for COVID-19 patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen therapy

The Covid-19 global pandemic has reshaped the requirements of healthcare sectors worldwide. Following the exposure risks associated with Covid-19, this paper aims to design, optimise, and validate a wearable medical device that reduces the risk of transmission of contagious droplets from infected patients in a hospital setting. This study specifically focuses on those receiving high-flow nasal oxygen therapy. The design process consisted of optimising the geometry of the visor to ensure that the maximum possible percentage of harmful droplets exhaled by the patient can be successfully captured by a vacuum tube attached to the visor. This has been completed by deriving a number of concept designs and assessing their effectiveness, based on numerical analysis, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and experimental testing. The CFD results are validated using various experimental methods such as schlieren imaging, particle measurement testing and laser sheet visualisation. Droplet capturing efficiency of the visor was measured through CFD and validated through experimental particle measurement testing. The results presented a 5% deviation between CFD and experimental results. Also, the modifications based on the validated CFD results improved the visor effectiveness by 47% and 38% for breathing and coughing events, respectively

Role and limitations of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients: An observational study.

Background: The management of acute respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients and the role and limitations of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT) remain unclear. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effect of HFNOT, identify the characteristics of patients who will benefit from therapy, and determine monitoring strategies to decide on endotracheal intubation for patients with COVID-19. Patients and Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of COVID-19 patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and required HFNOT for at least 2 days between 20 March 2020 and 20 June 2020. The exclusion criteria were a severe respiratory failure, reduced levels of consciousness, combination with other noninvasive ventilation strategies, and exhaustion. The patients were followed up until ICU discharge. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with COVID-19 who were successfully weaned from HFNOT, whereas failure comprised intubation or death on HFNOT. Results: Thirty-five subjects (24 males, mean-age: 61.62, standard deviation: 14.9 yr.) were included in the study. A total of 20/35 (57.1%) subjects survived to discharge. C-reactive-protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels were significantly increased in the treatment failure group (CRP; effect size (r):0.35, P: 0.037, IL-6; r: 0.37, P: 0.03). Although there was a difference between repeated measures of partial-pressure-of-oxygen/fraction-of-inspired-oxygen (PaO2/FiO2:P/F) rates (partial-eta-squared (ηp2):0.79, P < 0.001), no difference was found between carbon dioxide levels (ηp2:0.29, p: 0.44). There was also no difference between ROX (ratio-of-oxygen-saturation/FiO2 to respiratory-rate) rates (Kendall's W: 0.33 P = 0.310). Conclusion: In COVID-19 patients with mild-to-moderate dyspnea and hypoxemia who are nonresponsive to conventional-oxygen-therapies, the initial approach may involve the use of HFNOT. In this study, patient monitoring could be performed with ROX and P/F ratios, and the effectiveness of the treatment could be decided by looking at these rates in the second hour. Prolongation of the period and awake prone positioning did not improve the outcome.

High-flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is prone to acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). Because tracheal intubation is associated with a higher risk of death in these patients, AHRF employs high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT). The goal of this study was to assess the effect of HFNOT on oxygenation status as well as different predictors of HFNOT failure. Methods: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in COVID-positive critically ill adult patients (age >18 years) with AHRF, who were unable to maintain SpO2 >90% on a non-rebreathing face mask at an oxygen flow ≥15 L/minute. Respiratory variables (PaO2/FiO2, SpO2, and RR) before HFNOT (baseline) and then at 1 hour, 6 hours, 7th day, and 14th day after HFNOT application were recorded. Borg CR10 scale and visual analogue scale were used to evaluate the subjective sensation of dyspnea and comfort level, respectively. As needed, Student's t, Mann-Whitney U, or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed. To find parameters linked to HFNOT failure, multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were employed. Results: A total of 114 patients were enrolled in the study, with an HFNOT failure rate of 29%. The median PaO2/FiO2 ratio at baseline (before the initiation of HFNOT) was 99.5 (80-110) which significantly increased at various time points (1 hour, 6 hours, 7th day, and 14th day) after HFNOT initiation in the successful group. Patients reported significant improvement in sensation of breathlessness [9 (8-10), 3 (2-4); p <0.001] as well as in comfort level [2 (1-2), 8 (4-9); p <0.001]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score >7, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score >20, admission P/F ratio <100, D-dimer >2 mg/L, IL-6 >40 pg/mL, random blood sugar (RBS) >250 mg/dL, and 6 hours ROX Index <3.5 were independent prognostic factors of HFNOT failure. Conclusion: The use of HFNOT significantly increased the oxygenation levels in COVID-19 patients with AHRF at various time periods after HFNOT beginning. Age, SOFA score, APACHE II score, ROX score, admission P/F ratio, IL-6, D-dimer, and RBS were independent prognostic factors of HFNOT failure in this cohort. How to cite this article: Khan MS, Prakash J, Banerjee S, Bhattacharya PK, Kumar R, Nirala DK. High-flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(5):596-603.

Very late intubation in COVID-19 patients: a forgotten prognosis factor?

Description of all consecutive critically ill COVID 19 patients hospitalized in ICU in University Hospital of Guadeloupe and outcome according to delay between steroid therapy initiation and mechanical ventilation onset. Very late mechanical ventilation defined as intubation after day 7 of dexamethasone therapy was associated with grim prognosis and a high mortality rate of 87%.

Role of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in COVID-19 pneumonia with Eisenmenger syndrome: A case report.

Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic emerged in November 2019, various international guidelines and local protocols have been published to assist clinicians face the pandemic effectively. Medical and ventilatory strategies have evolved and researchers have come out with multiple studies and solutions within a short period of time. The patient's best interest is always the goal of the management. We present a case report of COVID-19 pneumonia in a patient with underlying Eisenmenger syndrome and the potential benefits of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in this patient.

Usage of high-flow oxygen therapy outside the intensive care unit: a possibility to delay or prevent the need for mechanical ventilation among COVID-19 patients / Nagy áramlású oxigénnel végzett terápia az intenzív osztály keretein kívül alkalmazva: lehetoség a gépi lélegeztetés késleltetésére vagy elkerülésére COVID­19-ben

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés és célkituzés: Szakirodalmi adatok a súlyos lefolyású COVID-19 terápiájában a noninvazív megoldások elonyét jelezték a prompt invazív megoldásokhoz képest. A COVID-19-pandémia drámai helyzetében felmerült a nagy áramlású oxigénnel (HFO) végzett terápia alkalmazásának létjogosultsága az intenzív terápiás osztály (ITO) keretein kívül. A szerzok a súlyos hypoxiával érkezo páciensek számára a "high-flow" kezelés legjobb orvosi gyakorlatát keresték. Módszer: Áttekintették a COVID-19-pandémia elso három hullámában a Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Oktató Kórház Infektológiai Osztályán HFO-val kezelt páciensek dokumentációját (n = 193). Nemparaméteres statisztikai módszerekkel elemezték a HFO-kezelés elott és alatt mért oxigénszaturáció-értékeket, a HFO-kezeléssel töltött napok számát és az egyes páciensek kórlefolyásának kimenetelét: a hazabocsátást, az ITO-ra áthelyezést vagy a halálozást mint három lehetséges végpontot megjelölve. Külön értékelték a harmadik hullám idoszakát (a standard terápia ekkorra kialakult). Eredmények: A járvány elorehaladtával a MET- (Medical Emergency Team) rendszer igénybevétele 811%-ra emelkedett, a HFO-készülékek száma 567%-kal nott. A COVID-19-protokoll szerinti kezelés mellett HFO-terápiára szoruló páciensek 18,7%-a invazív megoldást elkerülve, gyógyultan távozhatott, optimális terhelés és szakmai tapasztalat mellett ez az arány elérte a 36%-ot is. A hazabocsátható páciensek csoportjában a kezdeti szaturációk medián értéke 78%, a teljes HFO-kezelés ideje 8,5 nap volt. A páciensek 1%-ában pneumothoraxot, pneumomediastinumot észleltek. A végül közvetlenül hazabocsátható, illetve ITO-ra került páciensek kezdeti oxigénszaturáció-értékének különbsége nem bizonyult szignifikánsnak. Következtetés: A jelen közlemény is alátámasztja, hogy a kezdeti alacsony szaturációérték önmagában nem jelenti az invazív beavatkozás létjogosultságát ebben a kórképben. "High-flow" kezeléseket az intenzíves kezelés eloszobájaként nem intenzíves szakemberek is végezhetnek COVID-19-betegekben, rendszeres intenzíves konzultáció mellett, hogy a HFO-kezelés melletti rosszabbodás minél inkább felfedezheto legyen. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(7): 254-266. INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have shown the advantage of non-invasive over prompt invasive approaches in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19. The dramatic situation of the pandemic raised the legitimacy of using high-flow oxygen therapy (HFO) outside the intensive care unit (ICU). The authors investigated ways of its best practice. METHOD: They retrospectively analysed documentation of patients receiving HFO in the first three waves of the pandemic on the Infectious Diseases' Ward (n = 193), to record oxygen saturation levels before and during HFO, number of treatment days. Discharge at home, transfer to intensive care unit and death were chosen as the three possible endpoints. The period of the third wave (standard therapy established) was analysed separately. RESULTS: As the pandemic progressed, the usage of MET (Medical Emergency Team) grew to 811%, the number of HFO devices grew by 567%. With concomitant standard COVID-19 therapy, 18.7% of the patients requiring HFO could be discharged home, avoiding invasive solutions. With optimal workload and experience, this ratio reached 36%. Among patients later discharged home, the median oxygen saturation before HFO was 78%, the total time with HFO was 8,5 days. The occurrence of pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum was 1%. The difference in oxygen saturation before HFO between the patients later discharged home and those transferred to ICU was not significant. CONCLUSION: The results support the assumption that low oxygen saturation at admission does not inevitably require invasive intervention in COVID-19 patients, high-flow oxygen therapy can also be performed by non-ICU professionals as ante-room to the ICU, under regular supervision by ICU experts, so that the deterioriation of the patients' condition is discovered appropriately. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(7): 254-266.

High-flow nasal oxygen therapy decrease the risk of mortality and the use of invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia? A retrospective and comparative study of 265 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Corona virus disease (Covid-19) affects the airways and induces pulmonary lesions, patients with this disease require oxygen therapy as the disease progresses. Several oxygenation options have been used, l'HFNO had showed beneficial effects. THE OBJECTIVE OF THIS STUDY: To evaluate the efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen HFNO versus non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19. METHODS: This is a retrospective and comparative study conducted over a period of 10 months from March 2020 to December 2020 and involving 600 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit of the CHU Mohammed VI of Oujda for the management of acute respiratory failure caused by COVID-19. RESULTS: Out of 600 patients with acute respiratory failure, 265 patients were included in the analyses. 162 (61.10%) patients were treated with HFNO, the intubation rate was 49.7% (80 patients out of 162) of which 63 died intubated (78.8%). Concerning the 82 non-intubated patients, only 16 died (19.8%).The total number of patients who received NIV was 71 (26.8%), 33 (46.5%) required mechanical ventilation. In-hospital mortality in patients treated with NIV was 100%.The difference in mortality outcome between the two groups was significantly (P < 0.0001) reduced in HFNO. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with high-flow oxygen improved survival in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure compared with noninvasive ventilation, although no difference was observed in intubation rate.

Clinical significance of basic laboratory parameters in predicting the use of various methods of oxygen supplementation in COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection resulted in significant worldwide morbidity and mortality. The aim of our study was to evaluate the results of laboratory tests performed on patients on admission to the hospital between groups of patients requiring and not requiring oxygen supplementation, and to find predictive laboratory indicators for the use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT)/continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)/bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the data of consecutive patients hospitalised in the Pulmonology Department of the Temporary COVID Hospital in Poznan from February to May 2021. On admission to the department, the patients had a panel of laboratory blood tests. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 207 patients with a mean age of 59.2 ± 15.0 years of whom 179 (72%) were male. During hospitalisation, oxygen supplementation was required by 87% of patients. Patients requiring oxygen supplementation and/or the use of HFNOT/CPAP/BPAP had lower lymphocyte counts and higher levels of urea, C-reactive protein, D-dimer, troponin, glucose, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as well as higher white blood cell and neutrophil counts, The parameter that obtained the highest area under curve value in the receiver operator curve analysis for the necessary use of HFNOT/CPAP/BPAP or CPAP/BPAP was LDH activity. CONCLUSIONS: Among the basic parameters assessed on admission to the temporary hospital, LDH activity turned out to be the most useful for assessing the need for CPAP/BPAP active oxygen therapy. Other parameters that may be helpful for predicting the need for HFNOT/CPAP/BPAP are serum levels of urea, D-dimer and troponin.

Logistical Challenge With Prehospital Use of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in COVID-19-Induced Respiratory Distress: A Case Report.

Background Although commonly used inside hospitals, no previous case report has been published on high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) therapy in an adult in the prehospital setting. Case Report A 46-year-old nonsmoking man presented with a cough and fever. He deteriorated suddenly 5 days later. When the basic life support team arrived, his peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in ambient air was 56% and respiratory rate was 46 breaths/min. The man was weak with thoracoabdominal asynchrony. An emergency medical team with a physician was dispatched. As France was still under lockdown for the SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) pandemic, COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) was suspected. In spite of 15 L/min of oxygen delivered with a nonrebreathing mask, the patient's SpO2 tended to drop below 90% at the slightest effort and during transport from home to the ambulance. It was therefore decided to start HFNO therapy. The patient was transferred to an intensive care unit, where HFNO was continued. Why Should an Emergency Physician Be Aware of This? As the trend in emergency medical services may move toward prehospital HFNO, this case report is an opportunity to question the feasibility of HFNO therapy in the prehospital setting.

Noninvasive respiratory support and patient self-inflicted lung injury in COVID-19: a narrative review.

COVID-19 pneumonia is associated with hypoxaemic respiratory failure, ranging from mild to severe. Because of the worldwide shortage of ICU beds, a relatively high number of patients with respiratory failure are receiving prolonged noninvasive respiratory support, even when their clinical status would have required invasive mechanical ventilation. There are few experimental and clinical data reporting that vigorous breathing effort during spontaneous ventilation can worsen lung injury and cause a phenomenon that has been termed patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI). The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of P-SILI pathophysiology and the role of noninvasive respiratory support in COVID-19 pneumonia. Respiratory mechanics, vascular compromise, viscoelastic properties, lung inhomogeneity, work of breathing, and oesophageal pressure swings are discussed. The concept of P-SILI has been widely investigated in recent years, but controversies persist regarding its mechanisms. To minimise the risk of P-SILI, intensivists should better understand its underlying pathophysiology to optimise the type of noninvasive respiratory support provided to patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, and decide on the optimal timing of intubation for these patients.

Predictors of failure with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure: a multicenter observational study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to describe the use of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory failure and factors associated with a shift to invasive mechanical ventilation. METHODS: This is a multicenter, observational study from a prospectively collected database of consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to 36 Spanish and Andorran intensive care units (ICUs) who received HFNO on ICU admission during a 22-week period (March 12-August 13, 2020). Outcomes of interest were factors on the day of ICU admission associated with the need for endotracheal intubation. We used multivariable logistic regression and mixed effects models. A predictive model for endotracheal intubation in patients treated with HFNO was derived and internally validated. RESULTS: From a total of 259 patients initially treated with HFNO, 140 patients (54%) required invasive mechanical ventilation. Baseline non-respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [odds ratio (OR) 1.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-2.35], and the ROX index calculated as the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to inspired oxygen fraction divided by respiratory rate (OR 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.72), and pH (OR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.24-0.86) were associated with intubation. Hospital site explained 1% of the variability in the likelihood of intubation after initial treatment with HFNO. A predictive model including non-respiratory SOFA score and the ROX index showed excellent performance (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Among adult critically ill patients with COVID-19 initially treated with HFNO, the SOFA score and the ROX index may help to identify patients with higher likelihood of intubation.

Awake prone positioning does not reduce the risk of intubation in COVID-19 treated with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy: a multicenter, adjusted cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (awake-PP) in non-intubated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients could avoid endotracheal intubation, reduce the use of critical care resources, and improve survival. We aimed to examine whether the combination of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) with awake-PP prevents the need for intubation when compared to HFNO alone. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, adjusted observational cohort study in consecutive COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) receiving respiratory support with HFNO from 12 March to 9 June 2020. Patients were classified as HFNO with or without awake-PP. Logistic models were fitted to predict treatment at baseline using the following variables: age, sex, obesity, non-respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, APACHE-II, C-reactive protein, days from symptoms onset to HFNO initiation, respiratory rate, and peripheral oxyhemoglobin saturation. We compared data on demographics, vital signs, laboratory markers, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, days to intubation, ICU length of stay, and ICU mortality between HFNO patients with and without awake-PP. RESULTS: A total of 1076 patients with COVID-19 ARF were admitted, of which 199 patients received HFNO and were analyzed. Fifty-five (27.6%) were pronated during HFNO; 60 (41%) and 22 (40%) patients from the HFNO and HFNO + awake-PP groups were intubated. The use of awake-PP as an adjunctive therapy to HFNO did not reduce the risk of intubation [RR 0.87 (95% CI 0.53-1.43), p = 0.60]. Patients treated with HFNO + awake-PP showed a trend for delay in intubation compared to HFNO alone [median 1 (interquartile range, IQR 1.0-2.5) vs 2 IQR 1.0-3.0] days (p = 0.055), but awake-PP did not affect 28-day mortality [RR 1.04 (95% CI 0.40-2.72), p = 0.92]. CONCLUSION: In patients with COVID-19 ARF treated with HFNO, the use of awake-PP did not reduce the need for intubation or affect mortality.

Treatment of acute respiratory failure in the course of COVID-19. Practical hints from the expert panel of the Assembly of Intensive Care and Rehabilitation of the Polish Respiratory Society.

In 2019, a pandemic began due to infection with a novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. In many cases, this coronavirus leads to the development of the COVID-19 disease. Lung damage in the course of this disease often leads to acute hypoxic respiratory failure and may eventually lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Respiratory failure as a result of COVID-19 can develop very quickly and a small percent of those infected will die because of it. There is currently no treatment for COVID-19, therefore the key therapeutic intervention centers around the symptomatic treatment of respiratory failure. The main therapeutic goal is to main-tain gas exchange, mainly oxygenation, at an appropriate level and prevent the intensification of changes in the lung parenchyma. Depending on the severity of hypoxemia different techniques can be used to improve oxygenation. Medical staff dealing with COVID-19 patients should be familiar with both, methods used to treat respiratory failure and the epidemiological risks arising from their use. In some patients, conventional (passive) oxygen therapy alone is sufficient. In patients with worsening respiratory failure high flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNOT) may be effective. The continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) methods can be used to a limited extent. With further disease progression, invasive ventilation must be used and in special situations, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can also be administered. The authors of this article set themselves the goal of presenting the most current knowledge about the epidemiology and patho-physiology of respiratory failure in COVID-19, as well as the methods of its treatment. Given the dynamics of the developing pandemic, this is not an easy task as new scientific data is presented almost every day. However, we believe the knowledge contained in this study will help doctors care for patients with COVID-19. The main target audience of this study is not so much pneumonologists or intensivists who have extensive experience in the application of the techniques discussed here, but rather doctors of other specializations who must master new skills in order to help patients during the time of a pandemic.